MINING CO. v. TAYLOR


100 U.S. 37 (____)

MINING COMPANY v. TAYLOR.

Supreme Court of United States.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Harry I. Thornton and Mr. H.L. Smoot for the plaintiff in error.

Mr. W.E.F. Deal, contra.


MR. JUSTICE STRONG, after stating the case, delivered the opinion of the court.

Upon the facts found by the Circuit Court it is evident that Taylor, the plaintiff below, was entitled to recover, unless he was barred by the Statute of Limitations. Claiming, as both parties did, under Payne and Cook, the regularity and validity of the location of the mining claim are not in question. And when, in 1862, the plaintiff purchased...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases