DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS AGAINST HUPY

No. 2007AP1281-D.

799 N.W.2d 732 (2011)

2011 WI 38

In the Matter of DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS AGAINST Michael F. HUPY, Attorney at Law: Office of Lawyer Regulation, Complainant-Respondent, v. Michael F. Hupy, Respondent-Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided May 27, 2011.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the respondent-appellant there were briefs by Jeremy P. Levinson , Joseph M. Peltz and Friebert, Finerty & St. John, S.C., Milwaukee and oral argument by Jeremy P. Levinson .

For the complainant-respondent there was a brief and oral argument by Julie M. Scott , n/k/a Spoke, Office of Lawyer Regulation, Madison.


PER CURIAM.

ATTORNEY disciplinary proceeding. Attorney publicly reprimanded.

¶ 1 Attorney Michael F. Hupy appeals from the report and recommendation of the referee, Attorney James J. Winiarski, that he be publicly reprimanded for his professional misconduct and that he be required to pay the full costs of this disciplinary proceeding. In particular, Attorney Hupy challenges the referee's conclusions that he committed three violations of the Rules...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases