APPELWICK, J.
¶ 1 Woodbury sought administrative review of his whistleblower retaliation claim pursuant to SMC 4.20.860 and RCW 42.41.040. He then filed a separate complaint in superior court under the same city and state provisions. Because Woodbury does not have a cause of action in superior court, the trial court properly dismissed his claim.
FACTS
¶ 2 In October 2008, Woodbury filed a whistleblower complaint concerning the Seattle Fire...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.