BORNER v. AUTRY

No. W2007-00731-SC-R11-CV.

284 S.W.3d 216 (2009)

Helen M. BORNER et al. v. Danny R. AUTRY.

Supreme Court of Tennessee, at Memphis.

May 26, 2009.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mitchell G. Tollison, Jackson, Tennessee, for the Appellants, Helen M. Borner and Lekesa F. Borner.

Matt S. Shepherd and Wesley A. Clayton, Jackson, Tennessee, for the Appellee, Danny R. Autry.


OPINION

JANICE M. HOLDER, C.J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which CORNELIA A. CLARK, GARY R. WADE, WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., and SHARON G. LEE, JJ., joined.

This case involves the interpretation and application of Tennessee Code Annotated section 24-5-113(a), which provides a rebuttable presumption that medical bills itemized in and attached to the complaint are necessary and reasonable if the "total amount of such bills" does not exceed $4,000. We...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases