RETIREMENT PLANS COMMITTEE OF IBM v. JANDER

No. 18-1165.

140 S.Ct. 592 (2020)

RETIREMENT PLANS COMMITTEE OF IBM, et al., Petitioners v. Larry W. JANDER, et al.

Supreme Court of United States.

January 14, 2020.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul D. Clement , Washington, DC, for the petitioners.

Jonathan Y. Ellis , for the United States as amicus curiae, by special leave of the Court, supporting neither party.

Samuel Bonderoff , New York, NY, for the respondents.

Lawrence Portnoy , Michael S. Flynn , David B. Toscano , Trent Thompson , Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, New York, NY, Paul D. Clement , George W. Hicks, Jr. , C. Harker Rhodes IV , Andrew C. Lawrence , Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Washington, DC, for petitioners.

Samuel E. Bonderoff , Jacob H. Zamansky , James Ostaszewski , Zamansky LLC, New York, NY, for respondents.


In Fifth Third Bancorp v. Dudenhoeffer, 573 U.S. 409, 134 S.Ct. 2459, 189 L.Ed.2d 457 (2014), we held that "[t]o state a claim for breach of the duty of prudence" imposed on plan fiduciaries by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) "on...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases