IMPRESSION PRODUCTS v. LEXMARK INTERN.

No. 15-1189.

137 S.Ct. 1523 (2017)

581 U.S. 360

IMPRESSION PRODUCTS, INC., Petitioner v. LEXMARK INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided May 30, 2017.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Andrew J. Pincus , Washington, DC, for Petitioner.

Malcolm L. Stewart , Washington, DC, for the United States as amicus curiae, by special leave of the Court, supporting reversal in part and vacatur in part.

Constantine L. Trela, Jr. , Chicago, IL, for Respondent.

Edward F. O'Connor , Avyno Law, Encino, CA, Andrew J. Pincus , Paul W. Hughes , Matthew A. Waring , John T. Lewis , Karianne M. Jones , Mayer Brown LLP, Washington, DC, for Petitioner.

Timothy C. Meece , V. Bryan Medlock, Jr. , Jason S. Shull , Audra C. Eidem Heine, Banner & Witcoff, Ltd., Chicago, IL, Steven B. Loy , Stoll Keenon Ogden PLLC, Lexington, KY, Constantine L. Trela, Jr. , Robert N. Hochman , Sidley Austin LLP, Chicago, IL, Benjamin Beaton , Joshua J. Fougere , Sidley Austin LLP, Washington, DC, D. Brent Lambert , Lexmark Int'l, Inc., Lexington, KY, for Respondent.


A United States patent entitles the patent holder (the "patentee"), for a period of 20 years, to "exclude others from making, using, offering for sale, or selling [its] invention throughout the United States or importing the invention into the United States." 35 U.S.C. § 154(a). Whoever...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases