GUNN v. MINTON

No. 11-1118.

133 S.Ct. 1059 (2013)

185 L.Ed.2d 72

Jerry W. GUNN, et al., Petitioners v. Vernon F. MINTON.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided February 20, 2013.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jane Webre , Austin, Texas, for Petitioners.

Thomas M. Michel , Fort Worth, Texas, for Respondent.

Jane M.N. Webre , Cynthia S. Connolly , Scott, Douglass & McConnico, L.L.P., Austin, Texas, Robert S. Harrell , Charles B. Walker, Jr. , Fulbright & Jaworski, L.L.P., Houston, Texas, David E. Keltner , Kelly Hart & Hallman, L.L.P., Fort Worth, Texas, for Petitioners.

Thomas M. Michel , Robley E. Sicard , Griffith, Jay & Michel, LLP, Fort Worth, Texas, Coyt Randal Johnston , Robert L. Tobey , Coyt Randal Johnston, Jr. , Johnston Tobey, P.C., Dallas, Texas, Theodore F. Shiells , Shiells Law Firm P.C., Dallas, Texas, Gregory W. Carr , Carr LLP, Frisco, Texas, Daniel R. Ortiz , Charlottesville, Virginia, for Respondent.


Chief Justice ROBERTS delivered the opinion of the Court.

Federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction over cases "arising under any Act of Congress relating to patents." 28 U.S.C. § 1338(a). The question presented is whether a state law claim alleging legal malpractice in the handling of a patent case must be brought in federal court.

I

In the early 1990s, respondent Vernon Minton developed a computer program and telecommunications network designed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases