1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.Ct.
  4. 131 S.Ct.
  5. 131 S.Ct. 1740 (2011)
 

AT&T MOBILITY LLC v. CONCEPCION

No. 09-893.

131 S.Ct. 1740 (2011)

563 U.S. 333

AT&T MOBILITY LLC, Petitioner, v. Vincent CONCEPCION et ux.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided April 27, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Andrew J. Pincus , Washington, DC, for Petitioner.

Deepak Gupta , for Respondents.

Donald M. Falk , Mayer Brown LLP, Palo Alto, CA, Neal Berinhout , Atlanta, GA, Kenneth S. Geller , Andrew J. Pincus , Evan M. Tager , Archis A. Parasharami , Kevin Ranlett , Mayer Brown LLP, Washington, DC, for Petitioner.

Justice SCALIA delivered the opinion of the Court.

Section 2 of the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) makes agreements to arbitrate "valid, irrevocable, and enforceable, save upon such grounds as exist at law or in equity for the revocation of any contract." 9 U.S.C. § 2. We consider whether the FAA prohibits States from conditioning the enforceability of certain arbitration agreements on the availability of classwide...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED
OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases