1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.Ct.
  4. 129 S.Ct.
  5. 129 S.Ct. 2360 (2009)
 

YEAGER v. U.S.

No. 08-67.

129 S.Ct. 2360 (2009)

557 U.S. 110

174 L.Ed.2d 78

F. Scott YEAGER, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided June 18, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Samuel J. Buffone , Washington, DC, for petitioner.

Michael R. Dreeben , for respondent.

J.A. Canales , Canales & Simonson, Corpus Christi, TX, Samuel J. Buffone , Counsel of Record, Ryan M. Malone , Ropes & Gray LLP, Washington, DC, for Petitioner.

In Dunn v. United States, 284 U.S. 390, 393, 52 S.Ct. 189, 76 S.Ct. 356 (1932), the Court, speaking through Justice Holmes, held that a logical inconsistency between a guilty verdict and a verdict of acquittal does not impugn the validity of either verdict...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases