ROYSTER v. UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION BD.

No. 2569 C.D. 2010.

34 A.3d 324 (2011)

Grant ROYSTER, Petitioner v. UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION BOARD OF REVIEW, Respondent.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

Decided December 27, 2011.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard Veon , Reading, for petitioner.

Shawn J. Jayman , Assistant Counsel, Harrisburg, for respondent.

BEFORE: COHN JUBELIRER, Judge, and McCULLOUGH, Judge, and BUTLER, Judge.


OPINION BY Judge McCULLOUGH.

Grant Royster (Claimant) petitions for review of the November 9, 2010, decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board), which held that Claimant is ineligible for benefits under section 402(e) of the Unemployment Compensation Law (Law).1 We affirm.

Claimant was employed full-time by Spring City Electrical Management (Employer) as a molder and laborer from October 11, 2005, through...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases