WAH CHANG v. PUBLIC UTILITY COM'N

UM1002; A143692.

301 P.3d 934 (2013)

256 Or. App. 151

WAH CHANG, Petitioner, v. PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION of Oregon; and PacifiCorp, dba Pacific Power, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided April 17, 2013.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas W. Sondag , Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Lane Powell PC.

Michael Casper , Deputy Solicitor General, argued the cause for respondent Public Utility Commission of Oregon. On the brief were John R. Kroger , Attorney General, Anna M. Joyce , Solicitor General, and Judy C. Lucas , Senior Assistant Attorney General.

David J. Burman , Seattle, argued the cause for respondent PacifiCorp. On the brief were Lawrence H. Reichman and Perkins Coie LLP; Roy Pulvers and Hinshaw & Culbertson, LLP; and Natalie Hocken.

Before SCHUMAN, Presiding Judge, and WOLLHEIM, Judge, and NAKAMOTO, Judge.


SCHUMAN, P.J.

Petitioner Wah Chang entered into a special contract with PacifiCorp whereby PacifiCorp agreed to supply Wah Chang with electricity at rates different from its standard industrial tariff. For the first three years of the five-year contract, Wah Chang was to receive a rate that was substantially lower than PacifiCorp's standard industrial rate; for the remaining two years, Wah Chang was to be charged a rate tied to the Dow Jones California/Oregon Border...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases