1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 138 Ohio
  5. 138 Ohio St.3d 23 (2013)
 

PARRISH v. JONES

No. 2012-0623.

138 Ohio St.3d 23 (2013)

2013-Ohio-5224

PARRISH, ADMR., Appellee, v. JONES ET AL.; SKOCIK ET AL., Appellants.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided December 4, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rourke & Blumenthal, L.L.P., Kenneth S. Blumenthal , and Jonathan R. Stoudt , for appellee.

Arnold, Todaro & Welch Co., L.P.A., Kevin W. Popham , and Gregory B. Foliano , for appellants.

LANZINGER, J.

{¶ 1} We accepted this certified conflict to determine whether a trial court must consider the allegations set forth in the pleadings in addition to the opening statement when ruling on a motion for directed verdict made at the close of an opponent's opening statement. We hold that although a trial court is not required to consider allegations contained in the pleadings when ruling on a motion for directed verdict made...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases