STATE v. FUTURE

No. 96997.

2012 Ohio 2300

STATE OF OHIO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. DARWIN FUTURE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County.

Released and Journalized: May 24, 2012.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert L. Tobik , Cuyahoga County Public Defender, BY: John T. Martin , Assistant Public Defender, 310 Lakeside Avenue, Suite 200, Cleveland, Ohio 44113, Attorneys for Appellant.

William D. Mason , Cuyahoga County Prosecutor, BY: Katherine Mullin , Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, The Justice Center, 1200 Ontario Street, Cleveland, Ohio 44113, Attorneys for Appellee.

BEFORE: Celebrezze, P.J., Cooney, J., and E. Gallagher, J.


JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION

FRANK D. CELEBREZZE, JR., P.J.

{¶1} Appellant, Darwin Future, alleges that

the trial court's plea colloquy was constitutionally inadequate when it failed to advise appellant that his right against self-incrimination included a constitutional protection against any adverse comment being made about, or adverse inference drawn from, the exercise of his right not to testify at trial.

However, because...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases