1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 197 A.D.3d
  5. 197 A.D.3d 1041 (2021)
 

KARAM v. KARAM

Index No. 311251/18. Appeal No. 14222. Case No. 2020-03268.

197 A.D.3d 1041 (2021)

151 N.Y.S.3d 884

2021 NY Slip Op 05085

Egleé Cañizalez Karam, Appellant, v. Oswaldo Karam, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided September 28, 2021.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rabin Schumann and Partners LLP, New York ( Bonnie E. Rabin , of counsel), for appellant.

Aronson Mayefsky & Sloan, LLP, New York ( Michael A. Mosberg of counsel), for respondent.

Concur—Acosta, P.J., Singh, Kennedy, Mendez, Higgitt, JJ.

The motion court correctly determined that it did not have personal jurisdiction over defendant. Contrary to plaintiff wife's contention, the post-nuptial agreement executed by the parties in New York in 2015 does not substantially comply with Domestic Relations Law § 236(B)(3) and therefore fails to constitute a transaction of business for long-arm jurisdictional purposes (CPLR 302[a][1]; see Deutsch v Deutsch,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases