In this post-divorce tort action, plaintiff alleges two causes of action for malicious prosecution, based on two family offense proceedings defendant commenced against him, and a cause of action for defamation. In the proposed amended complaint, plaintiff asserts abuse of proceeding as an additional cause of action. Neither the original complaint nor the proposed amended complaint state a cognizable cause of action (see Davis & Davis v Morson,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
IVANCEV v. GARRIDO
11610. 150434/15.
184 A.D.3d 422 (2020)
124 N.Y.S.3d 678
2020 NY Slip Op 03190
Jacob Ivancev, Appellant, v. Roe Garrido, Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided June 4, 2020.
Decided June 4, 2020.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
