The record shows that the process server only attempted to effectuate service of process twice at an address which was not defendant's "actual place of business, dwelling place or usual place of abode within the state" (CPLR 308[4]). Under the circumstances presented, including that defendant had moved to Mexico almost a year before service was attempted, and that defendant had no contractual obligation to notify plaintiff that his address changed, plaintiff failed to satisfy...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
