Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the evidence was legally insufficient to support his conviction because the prosecution failed to prove his identity as the perpetrator of the crime of which he was convicted. The defendant's challenge to the legal sufficiency of the evidence is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05[2]; People v Hawkins,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.