ANDINO v. MILLS

No. 56.

31 N.Y.3d 553 (2018)

106 N.E.3d 714

81 N.Y.S.3d 331

2018 NY Slip Op 04273

NIURKA ANDINO, Respondent-Appellant, v. RONALD MILLS et al., Appellants-Respondents. (And a Third-Party Action.)

Court of Appeals of New York.

Decided June 12, 2018.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lawrence Heisler , New York City Transit Authority, Brooklyn ( Timothy J. O'Shaughnessy of counsel), for appellants-respondents.

Sullivan Papain Block McGrath & Cannavo P.C., New York City ( Brian J. Shoot of counsel), and Dansker & Aspromonte Associates, New York City ( Paul Dansker of counsel), for respondent-appellant.

Zachary W. Carter , Corporation Counsel, New York City ( Julie Steiner , Richard Dearing and Scott Shorr of counsel), for City of New York, amicus curiae.


OPINION OF THE COURT

The common question presented in these cross appeals is whether a retired New York City police officer's accident disability retirement (ADR) benefits are a collateral source that a court must offset against the injured retiree's jury award for future lost earnings and pension. We hold that ADR benefits...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases