MURLAR EQUITIES PARTNERSHIP v. JIMINEZ

6593, 17611/06.

161 A.D.3d 569 (2018)

73 N.Y.S.3d 751

2018 NY Slip Op 03625

Murlar Equities Partnership, Respondent-Appellant, v. Franklin Jiminez, Appellant-Respondent, et al., Defendants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided May 17, 2018.


Plaintiff's motion should have been denied, since the new evidence that plaintiff submitted in support of renewal, a loan document purporting to reduce the interest rate to the legal rate in the event of a finding of usury, would not change the prior determination that the loan was criminally usurious (see Bakhash v Winston, 134 A.D.3d 468 [1st Dept 2015]; CPLR 2221 [e] [2]). In any event, plaintiff did not assert additional material...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases