Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Riviezzo, J.), rendered June 20, 2013, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
DECISION & ORDER
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620, 621), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15; People v Danielson, 9 N.Y.3d 342, 348).
The defendant's contentions regarding alleged prosecutorial misconduct during summation are largely unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05; People v Dien, 77 N.Y.2d 885, 886; People v Nuccie, 57 N.Y.2d 818, 819). In any event, to the extent that some remarks may have been improper, they "were not so flagrant or pervasive as to deprive the defendant of a fair trial" (People v Ward, 106 A.D.3d 842, 843; see People v Thompson, 125 A.D.3d 899, 900; People v Philbert, 60 A.D.3d 698, 699; People v Almonte, 23 A.D.3d 392, 394).
RIVERA, J.P., BALKIN, BARROS and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.