KAUR v. GOKFELD

3635, 652288/10.

149 A.D.3d 419 (2017)

2017 NY Slip Op 02609

50 N.Y.S.3d 370

SIMRANJIT KAUR, Appellant-Respondent, v. VENIAMIN GOKFELD, Respondent-Appellant, et al., Defendant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided April 4, 2017.


Plaintiff and defendant Gokfeld signed a three-year lease agreement for two New York City taxi medallions owned by defendant Daniella Hacking Corp., with an option for plaintiff to purchase the medallions during the lease period. Plaintiff alleges that she timely sought to exercise her option to purchase the medallions and that defendants refused to sell them to her.

Resorting to the contract language alone, plaintiff failed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases