The court properly denied defendant's suppression motion. Defendant made the statements at issue while he was detained during a traffic stop. While defendant may have been seized for Fourth Amendment purposes, he was not in custody for Miranda purposes (see Berkemer v McCarty,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.