Plaintiffs, Marilyn Cattouse and Michael Cattouse, and their daughter Laurie Cattouse, allege that they sustained serious injuries to their cervical and lumbar spines as the result of a motor vehicle accident. Defendant established, prima facie, that plaintiffs did not sustain serious injuries by submitting the affirmed report of an orthopedist, who found normal ranges of motion, negative test results, and resolved strains/sprains (see Frias v Son Tien Liu,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
CATTOUSE v. SMITH
2526, 301102/13.
146 A.D.3d 670 (2017)
2017 NY Slip Op 00537
45 N.Y.S.3d 453
MARILYN CATTOUSE et al., Appellants, v. KEITH SMITH, Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided January 26, 2017.
Decided January 26, 2017.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
