Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The defendant contends that his due process rights were violated by the Supreme Court's denial of his request for an adjournment of the hearing pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C) to determine his risk level. "[T]he decision to grant an adjournment is a matter of discretion for the hearing court" (People v Lashway,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.