Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that her plea of guilty was not knowing, voluntary, or intelligent because she was not advised of certain constitutional rights she was forfeiting as a result of her plea of guilty, and because there was no inquiry as to whether she had discussed with her attorney the constitutional rights she was forfeiting. While the defendant validly waived her right to appeal (see People v Ramos,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.