The subject employment agreement contains an ambiguous provision regarding deferred compensation that can be read as indicating that plaintiff was to be employed for five years. Considered in conjunction with the five-year payment schedules and targets in the agreement, this ambiguous provision precludes a determination as a matter of law of the parties' intentions as to the term of plaintiff's employment (see Crabtree v Elizabeth Arden Sales Corp.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PETITT v. LMZ SOLUBLE COFFEE, INC.
2610, 652968/15.
146 A.D.3d 414 (2017)
2017 NY Slip Op 00018
43 N.Y.S.3d 742
MARY PETITT, Appellant, v. LMZ SOLUBLE COFFEE, INC., Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided January 3, 2017.
Decided January 3, 2017.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
