1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.Y.3d
  4. 27 N.Y.3d
  5. 27 N.Y.3d 609 (2016)
 

PEOPLE v. CROOKS

No. 116

27 N.Y.3d 609 (2016)

56 N.E.3d 222

36 N.Y.S.3d 440

2016 NY Slip Op 04975

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DAYSHAWN CROOKS, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of New York.

Decided June 23, 2016.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hug Law, PLLC, Troy ( Matthew C. Hug of counsel), for appellant.

P. David Soares , District Attorney, Albany ( Brittany L. Grome of counsel), for respondent.

Chief Judge DIFIORE and Judges PIGOTT, RIVERA, ABDUS-SALAAM, FAHEY and GARCIA concur.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Defendant contends that he was entitled to a hearing pursuant to People v Darden (34 N.Y.2d 177 [1974]) to determine whether the information provided by a confidential informant (CI) was sufficient to establish probable cause to support a search warrant for defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases