Ordered that the resentence is affirmed.
The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in determining that the defendant is not entitled to youthful offender treatment (see CPL 720.20 [1] [a]). Among other things, the court properly considered that the defendant inexplicably shot the 15-year-old victim at close range during a fight at a party, and that the defendant had a prior conviction of robbery in the second degree (see People v Wright,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.