14262, 100336/13.

125 A.D.3d 508 (2015)

In the Matter of WOODBRIDGE STRUCTURED FUNDING, LLC, Appellant, v. PISSED CONSUMER et al., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided February 19, 2015.

Petitioner, a private finance/structured settlement business, seeks pre-action discovery of the identity of anonymous speaker(s) who posted negative comments on respondents' website, "," regarding petitioner's alleged failure to fulfill an advertising promise to award prospective customers with a $500 gas card that included statements such as petitioner "Lie[s] To Their Clients" and "will forget about you and ... all the promises they made to you" once "you sign on the dotted line." The motion was properly denied since petitioner failed to demonstrate that it has a meritorious cause of action as required to obtain pre-action discovery (see CPLR 3102 [c]; Sandals Resorts Intl. Ltd. v Google, Inc., 86 A.D.3d 32, 38 [1st Dept 2011]). Nothing in the petition identifies specific facts that are false and when the statements complained of are viewed in context, they suggest to a reasonable reader that the writer was a dissatisfied customer who utilized respondent's consumers' grievance website to express an opinion. Although some of the statements are based on undisclosed, unfavorable facts known to the writer, the disgruntled tone, anonymous posting, and predominant use of statements that cannot be definitively proven true or false, supports the finding that the challenged statements are only susceptible of a non-defamatory meaning, grounded in opinion (see Sandals Resorts Intl. Ltd., 86 AD3d at 43-45). Petitioner also has inadequately asserted the damage element of a defamation claim, inasmuch as it has not alleged facts that would indicate injury to its business reputation from the postings (see id. at 39; see also Liberman v Gelstein, 80 N.Y.2d 429, 436 [1992]).


1000 Characters Remaining reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases