1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 93 A.D.3d
  5. 93 A.D.3d 418 (2012)
 

MUHLHAHN v. GOLDMAN

6894, 102846/10.

93 A.D.3d 418 (2012)

939 N.Y.S.2d 420

2012 NY Slip Op 1562

CARA MUHLHAHN, Respondent, v. ANDREW GOLDMAN et al., Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided March 1, 2012.

Defendant Goldman's affidavit and the attached recordings of his interviews with plaintiff should have been considered on the motion. An affidavit is an appropriate vehicle for authenticating and submitting relevant documentary evidence (see Suss v New York Media, Inc., 69 A.D.3d 411, 412 [2010]), and may provide "connecting link[s]" between the documentary evidence and the challenged statements...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases