1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 92 A.D.3d
  5. 92 A.D.3d 859 (2012)
 

RUBIO v. RUBIO

2011-02489.

92 A.D.3d 859 (2012)

938 N.Y.S.2d 807

2012 NY Slip Op 1446

HENRY RUBIO, Appellant, v. ROSEMARY RUBIO, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

Decided February 21, 2012.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Although, generally, an evidentiary hearing to determine the appropriate amount of an attorney's fee should be conducted before the court grants an award of an attorney's fee (see Matter of Hobenson v Tarnavsky, 76 A.D.3d 560, 561 [2010]; Kerrigan v Kerrigan, 71 A.D.3d 737, 738 [2010]; Sheikh v Basheer,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases