ESKENAZI v. MacKOUL

2011-01453.

92 A.D.3d 828 (2012)

939 N.Y.S.2d 484

2012 NY Slip Op 1425

LYNN ESKENAZI et al., Respondents, v. ROBERT E. MacKOUL et al., Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

Decided February 21, 2012.


Ordered that the order dated December 17, 2010, is affirmed, with one bill of costs payable by the defendants appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

Pursuant to CPLR 2221 (e), a motion for leave to renew "shall be based upon new facts not offered on the prior motion that would change the prior determination . . . and . . . shall contain reasonable justification for the failure to present such facts on the prior motion" (CPLR 2221 [e] [2], [3]). Although...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases