Petitioner's assertion that an unnamed NYCHA employee assured him that moving out of his public housing apartment would have no effect on his priority for a voucher cannot estop the agency from revoking petitioner's priority. Indeed, no discretion was involved in NYCHA's determination that petitioner lost his priority when he vacated the apartment, as this determination was mandated by the agency's policies (see Matter of Muhammad v New York City Hous. Auth.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MATTER OF KNOPFLER v. NEW YORK CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY
6785, 100637/11.
92 A.D.3d 507 (2012)
937 N.Y.S.2d 857
2012 NY Slip Op 1112
In the Matter of PINCHAS KNOPFLER, Respondent, v. NEW YORK CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided February 14, 2012.
Decided February 14, 2012.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
