The Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the plaintiff's amended cross motion which was for an award of arrears. Contrary to the defendant's contentions, the plaintiff's testimony, which was credited by a Judicial Hearing Officer, coupled with her submission of receipts, were sufficient to establish the amounts of the payments she made for the cost of child care necessitated...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
