The defendant's argument that his constitutional right to a jury in whose selection he had a voice was violated when the trial court discharged a juror who had plans to travel in the future but was not immediately unavailable (see CPL 270.15 [3]) is unpreserved for appellate review because he failed to raise this specific argument at trial (see People v Wells,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
