1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 91 A.D.3d
  5. 91 A.D.3d 1287 (2012)
 

ANDREWS, PUSATERI, BRANDT, SHOEMAKER & ROBERSON, P.C. v. COUNTY OF NIAGARA

CA 11-01549.

91 A.D.3d 1287 (2012)

937 N.Y.S.2d 648

2012 NY Slip Op 555

ANDREWS, PUSATERI, BRANDT, SHOEMAKER & ROBERSON, P.C., et al., Appellants, v. COUNTY OF NIAGARA, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department.

Decided January 31, 2012.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed with costs.

Memorandum: Plaintiffs commenced this action seeking damages for breach of contract and unjust enrichment based upon defendant's alleged failure to pay for legal services rendered by plaintiffs. Supreme Court properly denied plaintiffs' motion seeking summary judgment on the complaint and dismissal of the counterclaims. With respect to the complaint, plaintiffs' own submissions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases