In this action for personal injuries arising from plaintiff's use of an A-frame ladder, the Labor Law § 200 and common-law negligence claims against Midboro are not viable. The record shows that Midboro, the managing agent of the subject premises, did not directly control the method or means of plaintiff's work, or have actual or constructive notice of an unsafe condition (see e.g. Buckley v Columbia Grammar & Preparatory,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
RUSSO v. HUDSON VIEW GARDENS, INC.
6622, 301395/09
91 A.D.3d 556 (2012)
937 N.Y.S.2d 196
2012 NY Slip Op 464
JOSEPH RUSSO, Respondent, v. HUDSON VIEW GARDENS, INC., et al., Appellants.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided January 26, 2012.
Decided January 26, 2012.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.