1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 91 A.D.3d
  5. 91 A.D.3d 545 (2012)
 

KONRAD v. BROWN

102110/10, 6609, 6610, 6611, 6612.

91 A.D.3d 545 (2012)

937 N.Y.S.2d 190

2012 NY Slip Op 415

EVELYN KONRAD, Appellant, v. WILLIAM BROWN, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided January 24, 2012.

The motion court correctly found that defendant's allegedly defamatory statements in his letter to the editor were either not susceptible to a defamatory meaning, true or substantially true or pure opinion. The assertion that plaintiff had made a false statement before an administrative tribunal was substantially true, as shown by the video and transcript of the hearing; this was a complete defense (see Panghat v New York Downtown...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases