ALEXANDER W. HUNTER, J.
The motion by petitioner for an order pursuant to C.P.L.R. Article 78, annulling the respondent's decision to penalize petitioner because respondents failed to support the arbitrator's opinion by substantial evidence, the arbitrator prohibited the petitioner from pursuing her disparate treatment argument, the arbitrator showed bias, the arbitrator based his opinion on personal feelings and because the penalties shock the conscience, is denied...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.