VERIZON NEW JERSEY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
BOROUGH OF HOPEWELL, Defendant-Respondent.
State of New Jersey, Intervenor.
Supreme Court of New Jersey.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued May 2, 2024.
Decided July 25, 2024.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Natalie H. Mantell, Newark, argued the cause for appellant (McCarter & English, attorneys; Natalie H. Mantell and Farhan Ali, of counsel and on the briefs, and Brendan E. Ashe and Gregory M. Batt, on the briefs).
Joseph C. Tauriello argued the cause for respondent (The Law Office of Joseph C. Tauriello, attorneys; Joseph C. Tauriello, on the brief).
Joel L. Shain, Bernardsville, submitted a brief on behalf of amicus curiae New Jersey State League of Municipalities (Shain Schaffer, attorneys; Joel L. Shain, of counsel, and Gregory B. Pasquale and Xiaosong Li, on the brief).
Michelline Capistrano Foster, Trenton, Deputy Attorney General, submitted a letter in lieu of a brief on behalf of intervenor (Matthew J. Platkin, Attorney General, attorney; Melissa H. Raksa, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel).
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the judgment of the Appellate Division substantially for the reasons stated in Judge Accurso's comprehensive and thoughtful opinion. See Verizon N.J., Inc. v. Borough of Hopewell, ___ N.J. Super. ___, ___ A.3d ___, 2023 WL 11879982 (App. Div. 2023). We concur with the Appellate Division "that `local telephone...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
