1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. M&T BANK v. HAAS
 

M&T BANK v. HAAS

No. A-2017-20.

M&T BANK, s/b/m HUDSON CITY SAVINGS BANK, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. DYLAN HAAS, Defendant-Appellant, and MRS. DYLAN HAAS, fictitious spouse of DYLAN HAAS, and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendants.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 9, 2022.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stratton Ashtyani, LLP, attorneys for appellant ( Nicholas A. Stratton , on the briefs).

Schiller, Knapp, Lefkowitz & Hertzel, LLP, attorneys for respondent ( Richard A. Gerbino , on the brief).

Before Judges Fisher and Smith.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R. 1:36-3.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases