1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. AVHAD v. ELKHOLY
 

AVHAD v. ELKHOLY

No. A-2261-20.

PRAJAKTA V. AVHAD, M.D., and INTERVENTIONAL PAIN AND SPINE INSTITUTE, INC., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. DR. WAEL ELKHOLY, and PRECISION PAIN AND SPINE INSTITUTE, LLC, Defendants-Appellants.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided March 14, 2022.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven I. Adler argued the cause for appellants (Mandelbaum Salsburg, PC, attorneys; Steven I. Adler , on the briefs).

Evan L. Goldman argued the cause for respondent (Goldman Davis Krumholz & Dillon, PC, attorneys; Evan L. Goldman , of counsel and on the brief; Kelly A. Smith , on the brief).

Before Judges Alvarez and Haas.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R. 1:36-3.

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED
OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases