STATE v. RADEL

A-44 September Term 2020 A-45 September Term 2020 085129 084778.

267 A.3d 426 (2022)

249 N.J. 469

STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Christopher RADEL a/k/a Christoph R. Radel, Christpoh R. Radel, and Christohe R. Radel, Defendant-Respondent. State of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Keith Terres, Defendant-Appellant.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided January 20, 2022.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Deborah Bartolomey , Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant in State v. Radel (A-44-20) ( Andrew J. Bruck , Acting Attorney General, attorney; Deborah Bartolomey , of counsel and on the briefs).

Stefan Van Jura , Assistant Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for respondent in State v. Radel (A-44-20) ( Joseph E. Krakora , Public Defender, attorney; Stefan Van Jura , of counsel and on the briefs).

Tamar Y. Lerer , Assistant Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant in State v. Terres (A-45-20) ( Joseph E. Krakora , Public Defender, attorney; Tamar Y. Lerer , of counsel and on the briefs).

David M. Galemba , Special Deputy Attorney General/Assistant Salem County Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent in State v. Terres (A-45-20) ( John T. Lenahan , Salem County Prosecutor, attorney; David M. Galemba , of counsel and on the briefs).

Deborah Bartolomey , Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for amicus curiae Attorney General of New Jersey in State v. Christopher Radel (A-45-20) ( Andrew J. Bruck , Acting Attorney General, attorney; Sarah D. Brigham , Deputy Attorney General, of counsel and on the briefs).

Jason LeBoeuf argued the cause for amicus curiae Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers of New Jersey in State v. Radel (A-44-20), and State v. Keith Terres (A-45-20) (Zeigler, Resnick & Epstein, attorneys; Law Offices of Robert J. De Groot, attorneys; and Fox Rothschild , attorneys; Jason LeBoeuf , East Orange, Oleg Nekritin , East Hanover, and Matthew S. Adams , Morristown, on the brief).


One of the most valued of all constitutional rights is the right to be free from unreasonable searches of one's home. State v. Brown, 216 N.J. 508, 526, 83 A.3d 45 (2014). Because of the special status of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases