BASKIN v. P.C. RICHARD & SON

A-77 September Term 2019 084257.

249 A.3d 461 (2021)

246 N.J. 157

Ellen BASKIN, Kathleen O'Shea, and Sandeep Trisal, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. P.C. RICHARD & SON, LLC, d/b/a P.C. Richard & Son, and P.C. Richard & Son, Inc., d/b/a P.C. Richard & Son, Defendants-Respondents.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided May 5, 2021.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Chant Yedalian , of the California bar, admitted pro hac vice, argued the cause for appellants (Lite DePalma Greenberg and Chant & Company, attorneys; Bruce D. Greenberg , Newark, and Chant Yedalian , on the briefs).

William S. Gyves argued the cause for respondents (Kelley Drye & Warren, attorneys; William S. Gyves , Glenn T. Graham , and Robert N. Ward , Parsippany, on the briefs).

Bruce H. Nagel argued the cause for amicus curiae New Jersey Association for Justice (Nagel Rice, attorneys; Bruce H. Nagel , of counsel and on the brief, and Randee M. Matloff , Roseland, on the brief).


In this case, the Court considers whether plaintiffs sufficiently pled the class certification requirements to survive a motion to dismiss under Rule 4:6-2(e). Ellen Baskin, Kathleen O'Shea, and Sandeep Trisal (plaintiffs) filed a class action complaint against defendants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases