Karen Thompson argued the cause for amicus curiae American Civil Liberties Union of New Jersey and Electronic Frontier Foundation (American Civil Liberties Union of New Jersey, Kit Walsh (Electronic Frontier Foundation) of the California and Massachusetts bars, admitted pro hac vice, and Hannah Zhao (Electronic Frontier Foundation) of the New York bar, admitted pro hac vice, attorneys; Karen Thompson , Alexander Shalom , Jeanne LoCicero , Kit Walsh and Hannah Zhao , on the joint brief).
Dana M. Delger (Innocence Project Inc.) of the New York bar, New York, NY admitted pro hac vice, argued the cause for amicus curiae The Innocence Project ( Dana M. Delger (Innocence Project Inc.) of the New York bar, admitted pro hac vice, Mazraani & Liguori, LLP, Michael A. Albert (Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.) of the Massachusetts bar, admitted pro hac vice, and Anant K. Saraswat (Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.) of the Massachusetts bar, Boston, MA admitted pro hac vice, attorneys; Dana M. Delger , Joseph M. Mazraani , North Brunswick, Michael A. Albert and Anant K. Saraswat , on the brief).
Dino L. LaVerghetta (Sidley Austin LLP), of the District of Columbia and New York bars, Washington, DC, admitted pro hac vice, argued the cause for amici curiae Drs. Mats Heimdahl and Jeanna Matthews (Coughlin Duffy LLP, Dino L. LaVerghetta , (Sidley Austin LLP) of the District of Columbia and Virginia bars, admitted pro hac vice, and Iain C. Armstrong (Sidley Austin LLP) of the District of Columbia and Virginia bars, admitted pro hac vice, attorneys; Dino L. LaVerghetta , Iain C. Armstrong , Washington, DC, Matthew Hopkins , Morristown, and Mark K. Silver , Washington, DC, on the brief).
Singer & Fedun, LLC and Kendra K. Albert (Cyberlaw Clinic, Harvard Law School) of the Massachusetts bar, admitted pro hac vice, attorneys for amicus curiae Upturn, Inc. ( William Singer and Kendra K. Albert , on the brief).
Before Judges Fasciale, Rothstadt and Susswein.
The opinion of the court was delivered by
FASCIALE, P.J.A.D.
In this case of first impression addressing the proliferation of forensic evidentiary technology in criminal prosecutions, we must determine whether defendant is entitled to trade secrets of a private company for the sole purpose of challenging at a Frye...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.