1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. PENN NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. GROUP C COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
 

PENN NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. GROUP C COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

Nos. A-0754-15T1, A-0808-15T1.

PENN NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GROUP C COMMUNICATIONS, INC., Defendant-Respondent. G.M. SIGN, INC., individually and on behalf of a certified class as judgment creditors of GROUP C COMMUNICATIONS, INC., Intervenor-Respondent. PENN NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. GROUP C COMMUNICATIONS, INC., Defendant-Appellant. G.M. SIGN, INC., individually and on behalf of a certified class as judgment creditors of GROUP C COMMUNICATIONS, INC., Intervenor-Appellant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided July 31, 2018.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard C. Mason argued the cause for appellant in A-0754-15 (Cozen O'Connor and Kinney Lisovicz Reilly & Wolff, PC, attorneys; Kevin E. Wolff and Richard C. Mason, of counsel and on the briefs; Timothy P. Smith and Kathleen J. Devlin , on the briefs).

Jeffrey A. Berman (Anderson & Wanca) of the Illinois bar, admitted pro hac vice, argued the cause for respondents in A-0754-15 (Giordano, Halleran & Ciesla, PC, and Jeffrey A. Berman, attorneys; Michael J. Canning , of counsel and on the brief; Jeffrey A. Berman and Matthew N. Fiorovanti , on the brief).

Phillip Bock (Bock, Hatch, Lewis and Oppenheim, LLC) of the Illinois bar, admitted pro hac vice, argued the cause for appellants in A-0808-15 (Giordano, Halleran & Ciesla, PC, and Phillip Bock, attorneys; Michael J. Canning , of counsel and on the brief; Jeffrey A. Berman and Matthew N. Fiorovanti , on the brief).

Richard C. Mason argued the cause for respondent in A-0808-15 (Cozen O'Connor and Kinney Lisovicz Reilly & Wolff, PC, attorneys; Richard C. Mason and Samantha M. Evans , of counsel and on the briefs; Kevin E. Wolff , Timothy P. Smith , and Kathleen J. Devlin , on the briefs).

Before Judges Messano, O'Connor, and Vernoia.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R. 1:36-3.

During all...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases