HASKELL PROPERTIES, LLC v. THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY

No. A-1452-14T2.

HASKELL PROPERTIES, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, ST. PAUL FIRE & MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, FIRST STATE INSURANCE COMPANY, GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK f/k/a AMERICAN NATIONAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, and FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants-Respondents.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided August 4, 2016.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Eric E. Tomaszewski argued the cause for appellant (Golub Isabel & Cervino, P.C., attorneys; Mr. Tomaszewski, of counsel; Joseph A. Ferriero , on the briefs).

John Maloney argued the cause for respondent St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company (Graham Curtin, PA, attorneys; Mr. Maloney and Stephen V. Gimigliano , on the brief).

Michael E. Buckley argued the cause for respondents The American Insurance Company and Fireman's Fund Insurance Company (Rivkin Radler LLP, attorneys, join in the brief of respondent St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company).

Evan S. Neadel argued the cause for respondent First State Insurance Company (Becker Meisel, LLC, Wayne S. Karbal (Karbal, Cohen, Economou, Silk & Dunne, LLC), of the Illinois bar, admitted pro hac vice, and Gerald E. Ziebell (Karbal, Cohen, Economou, Silk & Dunne, LLC), of the Illinois bar, admitted pro hac vice, attorneys, join in the brief of respondent St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company).

Christopher P. Ferragamo (Jackson & Campbell, P.C.) of the District of Columbia bar, admitted pro hac vice, argued the cause for respondent Great American Insurance Company f/k/a American National Fire Insurance Company (DiFrancesco, Bateman, Coley, Yospin, Kunzman, Davis, Lehrer & Flaum, P.C., and Mr. Ferragamo, attorneys, join in the brief of respondent St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company).

Before Judges Espinosa, Rothstadt, and Currier.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

Plaintiff Haskell Properties, LLC appeals from the Law Division's order dismissing its complaint, which sought damages arising from defendants'/insurers' failure to provide coverage for the cleanup of a contaminated property plaintiff acquired in an asset sale approved...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases