1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. LIPPINCOTT v. BRIEL
 

LIPPINCOTT v. BRIEL

No. A-5255-12T4.

JUDITH LIPPINCOTT and KENNETH LIPPINCOTT, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ALFRED BRIEL and RUTH BRIEL, Defendants-Respondents.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 12, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel B. Zonies argued the cause for appellants.

William Pfister, Jr. , argued the cause for respondents.

Before Judges Sapp-Peterson and Hoffman.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs Judith and Kenneth Lippincott1 appeal from a June 21, 2013 Law Division order granting summary judgment in favor of defendants Alfred and Ruth Briel, and dismissing plaintiffs' complaint arising out of a slip-and-fall accident on defendants' snow-covered driveway. For the reasons that follow, we reverse and remand.

I.

At...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases