1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 66 A.3d
  5. 66 A.3d 157 (2013)
 

REESE v. WEIS

Docket No. A-5557-10T2

66 A.3d 157 (2013)

430 N.J. Super. 552

Ronald C. REESE, Plaintiff-Respondent/Cross-Appellant, v. Rebecca WEIS, f/k/a Rebecca Reese, Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Respondent.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 7, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gary Newman , Roseland, argued the cause for appellant/cross-respondent (Newman, McDonough, Schofel & Giger, P.C., attorneys; Mr. Newman and Alison M. Schmieder , on the briefs).

Bonnie C. Frost , Denville, argued the cause for respondent/cross-appellant (Einhorn, Harris, Ascher, Barbarito & Frost, P.C., attorneys; Ms. Frost , on the brief).

Before Judges LIHOTZ, OSTRER and KENNEDY.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

LIHOTZ, J.A.D.

At issue in this matter is whether defendant received a substantial economic benefit as a result of her cohabitation, such that alimony should be terminated. We conclude the inquiry regarding whether an economic benefit arises in the context of cohabitation must consider not only the actual financial assistance resulting from the new relationship, but also should weigh other enhancements to the dependent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases