1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. BUCK v. HENRY
 

BUCK v. HENRY

No. A-0362-09T1.

ROBERT BUCK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JAMES R. HENRY, M.D., Defendant-Respondent, and SANOFI-AVENTIS and SANOFI-SYNTHELABO, INC., Defendants.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided March 25, 2010.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John R. Connelly, Jr. argued the cause for appellant (Drazin & Warshaw, attorneys; Mr. Connelly, on the brief).

John J. Bannan argued the cause for respondent (Reynolds & Drake, attorneys; Mr. Bannan, on the brief).

Before Judges Fuentes and Simonelli.

PER CURIAM.

This is a medical malpractice case. By leave granted, plaintiff Robert Buck appeals from the order of the Law Division granting defendant Dr. James R. Henry's motion for summary judgment.1 The motion judge found that the two physicians who authored the affidavits of merit submitted by plaintiff to meet his burden under N.J.S.A. 2A:53A-41 were not qualified to evaluate and opine upon the propriety of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases